Biomechanical changes after keratorefractive lenticule extraction with CLEAR and after femtosecond LASIK, correlated with optical coherence tomography findings

Submitted: 26 February 2024
Accepted: 15 April 2024
Published: 24 April 2024
Abstract Views: 991
PDF: 96
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The aim of this retrospective, comparative, single-eye study was to assess the biomechanical changes after laser correction of myopia by keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) and by femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK), correlating them with the stromal changes on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Corneal biomechanical parameters, provided by the high-speed Scheimpflug camera CorVis-ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and measured pre-operatively and 1 week post-operatively, were: stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), stress-strain index (SSI), inverse integrated radius (IIR), deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DA ratio-2mm).

A total of 79 eyes undergone KLEx (CLEAR, Ziemer Group) and 93 eyes undergone FS-LASIK were included. The mean residual stromal bed (RSB) was 271.36±17.22 µm after KLEx and 304.21±21.82 µm after FS-LASIK (p=0.00). All parameters in both groups showed statistically significant post-operative changes (p=0.00), except for SSI after FS-LASIK (p=0.39). The percent changes in all parameters were significantly higher in the KLEx group. Even in the eyes with equal RSB (300±5 µm; 19 eyes post-KLEx, 26 eyes post-FS-LASIK), changes were significantly higher after KLEx (SP-A1: -35.9%; SSI: -6.7%) than after FS-LASIK (SP-A1: -29.6%; SSI: -3.8%) (respectively, p=0.02, and p=0.00). In KLEx, reduction in stromal thickness had a weak correlation with reduction in SP-A1 (r=0.39), and poor correlation with reduction in SSI (r=0.26).

In conclusion, stiffness parameters were significantly worse after KLEx than after FS-LASIK, even in eyes ending with similar RSB. These findings should be valued cautiously, as the CorVis-ST might not capture all the clinically significant alterations, especially in the post-KLEx bi-layered cornea.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Dupps WJJr, Randleman JB, Kohnen T, et al. Scientific nomenclature for keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) procedures: a joint editorial statement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023;49:1085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001328
Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:335–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174284
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2013;29:454–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03
Ambrósio R, Jr, Ramos I, Luz A, et al. Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties. Rev Bras Oftalmol 2013;76:99–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72802013000200005
Hashemi H, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, et al. Corneal biomechanics after SMILE, femtosecond-assisted LASIK, and photorefractive keratectomy: A matched comparison study. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023;12:12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.12
Xin Y, Lopes BT, Wang J, et al. Biomechanical effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the cornea. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:834270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.834270
Ibrahim H, Mohamed A, Abd Al-Magid M. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE and Femto-LASIK procedures (comparative study). AIMJ 2022;3:138-44.
Zhao Y, Chen D, Savini G, et al. The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging. Eye Vision 2020;7:32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0
Alió del Barrio JL, Canto-Cerdan M, El Bahrawy M, et al. Corneal stromal thickness changes after myopic laser corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022;48:334-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000765
Leccisotti A, Fields SV, De Bartolo G. Refractive corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application. Cornea 2023;42:1247-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003123
Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, et al. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg 2017;33:266–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03
Eliasy A, Chen K-J, Vinciguerra R, et al. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00105
Leccisotti A, Fields SV, De Bartolo G. Femtosecond-LASIK retreatments after primary myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea 2023;42:675-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003074
Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, et al. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S85–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20080101-15
Miot HA. Correlation analysis in clinical and experimental studies. J Vasc Bras 2018;17:275-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.174118
He S, Luo Y, Ye Y, et al. A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients. Ann Transl Med 2022;10:730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-330
Abd El-Fattah EA, El Dorghamy AA, Ghoneim AM, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after LASIK and F-SMILE with CorVis ST. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31:1762-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120945664
Cao K, Liu L, Yu T, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers Med Sci 2020;35:599-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02854-w
Osman IM, Helaly HA, Abdalla M, et al. Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0304-3
Chen S, Ma H, Zhao C. Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2023;102:32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
Lv X, Zhang F, Song Y, et al. Corneal biomechanical characteristics following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism with 3 different cap thicknesses. BMC Ophthalmol 2023;23:42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02786-8

How to Cite

Leccisotti, A., Fields, S. V., De Bartolo, G., Crudale, C., Posarelli, M., & Malandrini, A. (2024). Biomechanical changes after keratorefractive lenticule extraction with CLEAR and after femtosecond LASIK, correlated with optical coherence tomography findings. Laser Therapy, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2024.392