https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.326 Effective optical zone after corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application PDF Vol. 30 No. 2 (2023) Submitted: 10 September 2023 Accepted: 15 November 2023 Published: 23 November 2023 Myopia, LASIK, lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser, optical zone Abstract Views: 4298 PDF: 159 Publisher's note All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Authors Antonio Leccisotti leccisotti@libero.it Siena Eye Laser, Poggibonsi, Siena; Scuola di Specializzazione in Oftalmologia, Università di Siena, Italy. Stefania V. Fields Siena Eye Laser, Poggibonsi, Siena, Italy. Giuseppe De Bartolo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6666-2440 Siena Eye Laser, Poggibonsi, Siena, Italy. Christian Crudale https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4002-1481 Siena Eye Laser, Poggibonsi, Siena, Italy. Abstract Laser vision correction of myopia induces an effective optical zone (EOZ) smaller than the programmed optical zone (POZ) by 16 to 26%. We evaluated the EOZ after corneal lenticule extraction for myopia with astigmatism ≤1 diopter (D) with a new femtosecond laser application (CLEAR), compared to POZ in a retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series study. Forty eyes of 40 patients underwent lenticule extraction with the Ziemer CLEAR® application; the control group was composed of 40 eyes of 40 patients receiving myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); EOZ was calculated on difference tangential maps at 6 months. For lenticule extraction, mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.03±2.48 D; mean POZ was 6.43±0.27 mm; EOZ 5.55±0.45 mm; mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 0.88 ± 0.28 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 13.60%±4.75; a positive correlation between preoperative SE and percent reduction of EOZ was found (r=0.63). For LASIK, mean preoperative SE was -5.89±2.14 D; mean POZ was 6.57±0.34 mm; EOZ 5.16±0.53 mm; the mean difference between POZ and EOZ was 1.41±0.35 mm (p=0.00); the mean reduction of EOZ compared to POZ was 21.46%±5.20. The mean difference between EOZ of the 2 procedures was 0.39 mm (p=0.0008). The mean difference between the reduction in optical zone (POZ-EOZ) of the 2 procedures was -0.53 (p=0.00). In conclusion, in myopia with low astigmatism, the CLEAR application for lenticule extraction provided a limited reduction in EOZ, compared with existing platforms. A positive correlation exists between corrected SE and reduction of the EOZ. Metrics Dimensions Altmetric PlumX Metrics Downloads Download data is not yet available. Citations References Tabernero J, Klyce SD, Sarver EJ, Artal P. Functional optical zone of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1053-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0867 Freedman KA, Brown SM, Mathews SM, Young RSL. Pupil size and the ablation zone in laser refractive surgery: considerations based on geometric optics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1924-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00214-1 Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:335–9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174284 Hou J, Wang Y, Lei Y, Zheng X. Comparison of effective optical zone after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018;44:1179-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.046 Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, et al. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study. J Refract Surg 2019;35:230-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20190313-01 Sun L, Lin H-N, Jhanji V, et al. Changes in effective optical zone after small-incision lenticule extraction in high myopia. Int Ophthalmol 2022;42:3703-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02367-6 Liu S, Zhang X, Niu L, et al. Comparison of the functional optical zone in eyes with high myopia with high astigmatism after SMILE and FS-LASIK. J Refract Surg 2022;38:595-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20220725-01 Song YW, Cui MF, Feng Y, et al. Comparative study of functional optical zone: small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser assisted excimer laser keratomileusis. Int J Ophthalmol 2023;16:238-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.02.10 Leccisotti A, Fields SV, De Bartolo G. Refractive corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application. Cornea 2023;42:1247-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003123 Ding X, Fu D, Wang L, et al. Functional optical zone and visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopic astigmatism. Ophthalmol Ther 2021;10:273-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00330-9 Chang DH, Waring GO IV. The subject-fixated coaxially sighted corneal light reflex: a clinical marker for centration of refractive treatments and devices. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;158:863-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.028 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 2013;29:454-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03 Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ. Coaxially sighted corneal light reflex versus entrance pupil center centration of moderate to high hyperopic corneal ablations in eyes with small and large angle kappa. J Refract Surg 2013;29:518-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130719-08 Miot HA. Correlation analysis in clinical and experimental studies. J Vasc Bras 2018;17:275-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.174118 Huang Y, Ding X, Han T, et al. Effective optical zone following small incision lenticule extraction for myopia calculated with two novel methods. J Refract Surg 2022;38:414-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20220608-02 He S, Luo Y, Chen P, et al. Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of functional optical zone, and visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022;11:13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.13 Wei PH, Wang Y, Li H, et al. Effect of optical zone diameter on corneal biomechanical properties after small incision lenticule extraction. [Zhonghua yan ke za hi] Chinese J Ophthalmol 2017;53:182-7. Roy AS, Dupps WJ Jr, Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:971-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.065 Dupps WJ Jr, Roberts C. Effect of acute biomechanical changes on corneal curvature after photokeratectomy. J Refract Surg 2001;17:658-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20011101-05 Ying J, Cai J, Zhu L, Zha Y. Comprehensive evaluation of anterior corneal change in asphericity calculated by the tangential radius of curvature after LASIK. J Ophthalmol 2017:3874371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3874371 Koller T, Iseli HP, Hafezi F, et al. Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:584-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.049 Hashemi H, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, et al. Corneal biomechanics after SMILE, femtosecond-assisted LASIK, and photorefractive keratectomy: A matched comparison study. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023;12:12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.3.12 Li H, Peng Y, Chen M, et al. Six modes of corneal topography for evaluation of ablation zones after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258:1555-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04674-z Author Biography Antonio Leccisotti, Siena Eye Laser, Poggibonsi, Siena; Scuola di Specializzazione in Oftalmologia, Università di Siena School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK Citation / Copyright How to Cite Leccisotti, A., Fields, S. V., De Bartolo, G., & Crudale, C. (2023). Effective optical zone after corneal lenticule extraction with the CLEAR femtosecond laser application. Laser Therapy, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2023.326 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published. Similar Articles Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, Giuseppe De Bartolo, Christian Crudale, Incidence and outcome of suction loss during corneal lenticule extraction with the femtosecond laser application CLEAR , Laser Therapy: Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023) Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, Giuseppe De Bartolo, Christian Crudale, Matteo Posarelli, Alex Malandrini, Biomechanical changes after keratorefractive lenticule extraction with CLEAR and after femtosecond LASIK, correlated with optical coherence tomography findings , Laser Therapy: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, Giuseppe De Bartolo, Christian Crudale, Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy, femtosecond-LASIK and lenticule extraction in a 100,000-eye case series , Laser Therapy: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, Giuseppe De Bartolo, Christian Crudale, Matteo Posarelli, Keratorefractive lenticule extraction in eyes with post-herpetic scars , Laser Therapy: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) Leonardo Longo, Roberto Dell'Avanzato, Diego Longo, ENDOLIFT® and multi-wavelength laser photobiomodulation: a randomized controlled trial study on 96 subjects, treating skin laxity of the lower third of the face , Laser Therapy: Vol. 29 No. 1 (2022) Diego Longo, Giulio Cherubini, Vanessa Mangè, Paolo Lippi, Leonardo Longo, Daniela Melchiorre, Maria Angela Bagni, Effects of laser therapy and Grimaldi’s muscle shortening maneuver on spasticity in central nervous system injuries , Laser Therapy: Vol. 29 No. 1 (2022) Sana Nadeem, Frequency-doubled neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser trabeculoplasty as adjuvant therapy for open-angle glaucomas , Laser Therapy: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) Riccardo Lazzari, Carlo Fornaini, Leonardo Longo, Fractional treatment of rosacea by LBO 532 nm laser with “one shot” procedure: A preliminary study , Laser Therapy: Vol. 29 No. 2 (2022) Luca Zattoni, Alessia Forlin, Real-life efficacy interstitial laser therapy treating laxity of the periorbital region , Laser Therapy: Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023) Mahshid Saffarpour, Sajjad Gerami, Nastaran Parviz, Nasim Chiniforush, Evaluating the effectiveness of two wavelengths of 810 and 980 nm Diode laser with two different beam profiles on tooth discoloration in bleaching: an experimental study , Laser Therapy: Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) 1 2 3 4 5 > >> You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.